Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Zebra Black's avatar

Dear Natassia,

Reading your newsletter, I felt the pulse of what Marina Abramović named so clearly: orgasm as a moment of aliveness, a connection to nature, to luminous beauty. To those of us who live with the erotic as an aesthetic, it is not a side note—it is the vital current of our lives.

The erotic is not performance, nor accessory. It is the architecture of staying alive. It is how we breathe into our bodies, how we claim confidence, how we meet our communities with passion. For those who appreciate its aesthetic, pleasure is not indulgence—it is sustenance.

Your words remind me that reclaiming sexuality is not only about desire, but about survival, about vitality. We live to stay alive, and the erotic is the art that keeps us here. xo

Dr. Nicole Mirkin's avatar

This feels like an argument for pleasure as infrastructure, not indulgence. What threads through each section is the insistence that desire is information: about health, agency, communication, and aliveness. Reframing “low desire” away from deficit and toward context, permission, and embodiment quietly dismantles a lot of bad science and worse cultural messaging. I especially appreciate how pleasure is positioned as something that radiates outward—into confidence, clarity, and connection—rather than something contained to the bedroom. It reads as an invitation to take women’s erotic lives seriously, without apology.

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?